Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Image As seen outside Serendipity

This past Saturday and Sunday marked Denton County’s 167th birthday, and all the square was abuzz with celebratory deals.  I got new shoes at Shoe Fly and a remarkable Chianti at Wine Squared.  I also got to hang out with my sister and her husband, so bonus for me!

It was also the opening day of Denton Community Market’s 2013 season.  This is my favorite thing that Denton does.  Local farmers and artisans and food vendors set up every Saturday to sell their goods.  I always leave with fresh veggies for the week (well, hello, glorious kale – how you doin’?) and at least one other item.  The other item this week was a seedling of purple basil.  It’s officially the founding member of my indoor herb garden.  I’ve named it Cecil.

I’m weighing my options for CSA this summer.  Quite a few of the folk who organize our local ones pop up at the market.  I’ll need them when the season is over.

Happy birthday, Denton.  I love you!

Easter weekend

 

 

 

Image

First, meet Quincy, my cute, new chair.  He came home this Saturday and is fitting in quite nicely in the reading nook.

I pried myself away from him long enough on Sunday to go to church.

I was a holiday churchgoer this weekend.  I was one of Those People.

Growing up, Those People were looked on with thinly veiled disdain.  They were the ones who clearly only loved God when it was convenient or popular.

Yesterday, I was one of them.  And I can attest firsthand that my faith and love for God is neither convenient nor popular.  I can attest that people do things for their own reasons, which might be very different from the reason that we imagine we might have if we were to do that exact same thing.

A friend wanted to go to one of the mega-churches in the Metroplex and invited me to go with her.  I said yes.  Insert a few days of fear and trembling here.

Then it was Easter morning.

Snippets of the morning:

– Eating a very bland breakfast so that the combination of my fair-weather-friend stomach and nervous energy didn’t end in disaster.

– Fun one-on-one time driving there and back with a good friend.

– Uniformed parking police directing traffic at the church.  Benches in the middle of the parking lot, presumably for people to wait for the golf carts that come around and give those who need it a ride to the door.  I can’t…even…

– Thankful to be with someone who also finds that equal parts strange and practical.

– They have a choir.  I miss choir.  They were my favorite part of the service.  The choir director was a woman, and she was fantastic.  I couldn’t take my eyes off her.

– Standard Easter sermon.  Well-organized, thought-provoking, adequate passion/enthusiasm.  Hard to turn off the speech teacher ears.  I might have lost my patience with sermons.  I might not think that’s a bad thing.

– We sang hymns.  I miss hymns.  I mean, I sing them at home (you’re welcome, neighbors).  But I miss singing them with others.

– There was a commercial break.  It was a series of videos about upcoming events at the church and different services they offer, and I suppose the snazzy video is the fun thing that old people assume the kids are into these days.  But it was a commercial break.  In a worship service.  Again, I understand the practicality of it.  But it was jarring.

– The preacher started the sermon with the Paschal greeting “Christ is risen!” to which we replied “He is risen indeed!”  He coached the crowd ahead of time.  I wonder how many would have known how to respond if he hadn’t.  It would have been interesting to see.  Hard to turn the social scientist head off as well.

– I bought a friend-of-a-friend’s book in the bookstore after the service.  I only thought about money-changers in the temple and table-tossing and how I don’t think I’m rich enough to really go there a little bit while I was in the store.  I really love books.

Overall, I had a good morning, and nothing terrible happened.  I expected Easter to make me miss going to church.  I am not sure that it did.

What to do…

I am experiencing an ethical dilemma regarding the Starbucks shareholder drama. In a nutshell, several of my more conservative, evangelical friends are outraged at CEO Howard Schultz’s announcement to the shareholders that he does not support the traditional family and that people who are against gay marriage can sell their shares and take their business elsewhere, and they have decided to boycott Starbucks as a result.

My ethical dilemma is this:

I am all for people not supporting Starbucks.  But Schultz didn’t say that. Not actually. Not quite.

He never said that he doesn’t support what they define as the “traditional family.” He has never said that he does not support heterosexuals’ right to marry. He merely disputed the shareholder’s claim that their commitment to marriage equality was the reason that they lost business in the quarter after they made that announcement by pointing out that shareholders got a 38% return on their investment last year. He then said that if the shareholder in question was unhappy with the 38% return (again, not their stance on marriage, although he did make a point to reiterate their commitment to diversity), he was welcome to sell his shares of Starbucks and invest in another company.

Yes, Starbucks is a supporter of equal marriage rights. This is not news. It’s part of their commitment to “embracing diversity,” as you can hear Schultz himself say in this video. If they want to boycott based on that – fine. I will accept this course of action, and I will not point out their hypocrisy – that when others boycotted Chick-Fil-A for their CEO’s statement about marriage, these same people who are up in arms about Starbucks were the ones commenting on how silly it was that someone would boycott a company because they disagreed with their political views.

Oh, wait. I guess I did just point it out. Well, I won’t point it out to them.

Because on the one hand, people should get their facts straight before speaking out against someone or something.

But on the other hand, this just means more people NOT drinking Starbucks, and that makes me happy. There are plenty of good reasons not to support Starbucks. The most important one to me is that all of their coffee is not fairly traded, which means that a good portion of their product is produced by what basically amounts to slave labor. And yes, there are many products for which there is not a readily available, fair-labor option, but coffee is not one of those products. Anyone, anywhere, can buy fairly traded coffee with fairly little effort. And coffee drinkers with a conscience should be doing so.

So while the reason they’re boycotting is, well…stupid, I can’t quite bring myself to correct them and thus encourage them to continue supporting Starbucks.  After all, isn’t one of my New Year’s Resolutions not to get involved in Facebook drama?  I think I’m going to go ahead and hide behind that.

[Aside – I have noticed that most of my Catholic and Orthodox friends tend not to get involved in these things. I like that about them.]

Perhaps the real ethical dilemma is that I’m having way too much fun with this and being just a little bit catty about it. And on Holy Week. Shame on me.

🙂

  • {Day 3} What You Learned: On Thursday, February 28, link up at Preston Yancey’s blog and write about these questions: What surprised you this week? What did you take away from the discussion? What blog posts did you find particularly helpful? What questions do you still have?

This week was full of surprises, and all of them were good.

There are so many rich, wonderful voices in the places where feminism and Jesus collide – so many more than I knew.  So many more than I can choose.   Between working and reading, I haven’t slept a lot this week, but my sleep-deprived haze is a dreamy one – the euphoria of living in the magic of a book I can’t put down. FemFest has been that book this week.

This discussion has not stayed quietly on paper (er…screen?).  Several people saw my links on Facebook and Twitter and have stopped by to have conversations or emailed me to continue the conversation.  Many of them have experienced the same Happy Book Stupor that I’ve experienced this week in reading the posts, and they are thirsty for more.  I encouraged them to post their own pieces, and they responded that they didn’t think that they could say it as well as it had already been said.

Let me encourage you again to do the thing that this week has driven home to me the most – this time in writing.  Your voice is important.  What you have to say is important, and no one can speak your mind better than you can.  Speak.  Write.  Dance.  Sing.  Paint.  Play.  Fight.  But join the conversation.

To that end, I want to start a group.  I’m not sure if I want it to be a writer’s group or a reader’s group or both.  I think I would prefer for it to be a face-to-face group, if for no other reason than I make a mean frittata and would love to have another excuse to feed people.  I also think that there are specific things to be done and said where I am that don’t really translate to anywhere else.  But I have met me, so I’m pretty sure I won’t be able to resist expanding discussion via the intrawebs, at least in part.  The group is just a baby idea right now.  Who knows what it will grow up to be?

Step one – gauging interest with my face-to-face crowd.  More to come on this.

Thanks for inspiring me this week, FemFest.  This was fun.

Edited to add – !!!  Congress passes VAWA.

{Day 2} Why It Matters: On Wednesday, February 27, link up at Danielle Vermeer’s blog, and write about these questions: What is at stake in this discussion? Why is feminism important to you? Are you thinking about your children or your sisters or the people that have come before you? Or, why do you not like the term? What are you concerned we’re not focusing on or we’re losing sight of when we talk about feminism? Why do you feel passionately about this topic?

Feminism is important to me, because I can’t do it alone. I need the world to want equality in both word and deed – for everyone. And I need feminism, because lately, I’ve been angry.

I want to be hopeful, and I am (sort of) – it’s just not the prevalent force in my life that I want it to be.

I am angry that…

– Too many women still have to work harder to earn the same respect, money, position, or insert-your-desired-compensation-for-work-here that men do, and that’s ridiculous. Don’t know any woman who has had that experience? Welcome to me. I can name four specific times in the last ten years of my career when I have been passed over for a job, only to find out that the man who got the job not only had less education than I do but more importantly, significantly less experience. And I would like to be able to say that those specific men chosen performed those jobs just as well as I would have, so it all worked out, but that’s only true of one of them (who was great at it, and I’m so glad that he got the job). The other three performed exactly how any rational person would expect someone with their limited skills and experience to perform. It’s frustrating enough to lose a job where I know I’d be an asset, but to lose it to someone who does not excel at it is maddening. I’m not naïve enough to think that the choice to hire them rather than me was merely institutional sexism – there were probably many factors involved, some of which were likely my own doing – but I am also not naïve enough to believe that sexism wasn’t one of the factors. And it needs to stop being one of the factors.

I don’t want to seem ungrateful. I do have two jobs that I generally like, while a lot of people are having problems finding any job at all. And there could be more cards stacked against me. I could be a woman AND a minority. I suppose I should see myself as one of the lucky ones. But do you really want to defend the position that working sixty hours a week, just to make ends meet, is lucky? Is that what a system that works looks like to you? That’s certainly not what it looks like to me, and that it works even less for some people than for others is wrong.

– Too many people are bound by rigid, socially constructed gender roles, and their unhappiness that they can’t seem to conform to them, despite constant pressure from church/family/media/society to do so, is unnecessary. I want a world where people can grow into themselves, especially the part of the self where their gender makes sense to them, without being told who they should be and being punished for violating some absurd norm from some imaginary world that was birthed so that the limited number of people who actually fit the stereotypes could feel superior.

– Too many people live in fear. I hate rape culture. I hate that, as a single woman living alone, I have had to take self-defense classes, and that I have various tools that can easily be used as weapons (and yes, I’ve practiced) stashed around my home, and that I have an escape plan – from my own damn home – the place that should be the safest place in the whole world for me – should it become compromised or violated. I hate that I am terrified that I just announced on the Internet that I am a single woman living alone. I hate that education on the subject tends to focus on how not to get raped instead of how to choose not to rape, assuming that prevention is a lost cause or worse – assuming that some people somehow deserve to be degraded. I hate that, twenty years after being a first-year college student myself, our culture is still so stunted in its awareness of this problem that I still have to explain to first-year college students why it matters whether or not they laugh at jokes about rape or abuse – why it is a big deal, always and every time –that that’s how desensitization works and that the complacency created by their desensitization is a big part of said problem. I hate that survivors of violence and abuse are silenced because their real and personal trauma seems like nothing but a big joke to our culture, which leads them to think that no one cares or will believe them and that, more often that you would believe, they’re absolutely right. I hate that rape culture is “just the way the world is,” and I refuse to let it stay that way.

– Too many people – mostly women and girls – are sold into slavery. I need feminism, because sex trafficking exists, and that’s not okay. I need feminism, because it pisses me off to live in a world where I have to say that sex trafficking – specifically, the selling of someone without her/his free consent (i.e., without threat of punishment, abuse, homelessness, ostracism, personal rejection, etc.) – is not okay. I need feminism because this is a problem in my country, in my state, not just “elsewhere.” And if somehow you manage to live in this world and you still didn’t know that, then you need feminism, too, because clearly your churches and your classrooms aren’t even talking about it, and that’s a problem.

– Too much of the world has too many problems, and too few people are whole enough to see far enough outside themselves to resolve them. There are people whose lives are defined by realities that I merely fear. There are people who work themselves to death and still go hungry and homeless. There are people who have to resort to illegal means or means that we, the richest 1% in the world, judge from afar as unethical in order to feed their family, because making an honest living doesn’t actually make a living at all (but it sure does make it possible for us to get great deals at Walmart, so for all our judgment, it seems that, once again, we’re the problem). There are people plagued by disease and poverty who have a voice but don’t have anyone to listen to it. We need to stop being selfish, sexist, controlling, thieving, abusive assholes to one another, because the world needs all the help it can get, and there are only so many hours in a day, and sometimes it’s too much to ask that we overcome our trauma and everyone else’s trauma, too. I am embarrassed that I ever accept that as an excuse not to try.

I am angry that people can see problems right in front of them, hurting people they claim to love,and still not understand or care.

I am angry, because I REFUSE to be apathetic, and most days, those seem like the only two choices.

I’m fed up. I’m tired. I could have written this post twenty years ago, because so little has changed. That’s exhausting. It’s disheartening to work so hard – to teach so much – and see it make so little difference. And I’ve only been at it twenty years. I think of those who have worked toward these goals for two or three times as long as I have, and I sometimes wonder how they get out of bed in the morning.

But between Jesus and feminism (which I suspect Jesus has a bit of a hand in), I have learned how to hope, so I can’t wait until I’m fixed to help others. There might be many pains outside our control, but there are enough pains that are fully within our grasp to alleviate or prevent. So let’s alleviate or prevent them. Let’s all cause each other less trauma. I need feminism (and my Jesus who taught it to me), because at its core is the theme that everyone benefits not only by our being less terrible to one another but also by our being good to one another.

So I am angry. But there is hope. Reading other FemFest posts this week has refreshed some of that hope in me. More on that tomorrow.

Here’s the prompt:

“On Tuesday, February 26, link up at J.R. Goudeau’s blog, and write about these questions: What is your experience with feminism? What’s a story or a memory or a person that you associate with that word? Why does it have negative or positive connotations for you? How do you define the term, either academically or personally? What writers have you read whose definitions you want to bring out? Or, if you don’t have a definition, what are some big questions you have?”

Here’s my answer:

The person whom I associate with feminism is someone who probably wouldn’t identify with the label – my mother. She’s the strongest woman I know, and her strength cannot be contained by the boxes of gender roles. She taught me the importance of education (insisted on it, really), the value of honesty (even when it’s not popular or “nice”), and that there is nothing that I want that should be out of my reach. She reminds me of the quintessential Southern woman – self-controlled and genteel on the surface; hell-raiser and in control in reality.

One morning, while helping my sister get ready for church, Mom caught her singing Let’s Go All the Way.

She told her, in the drawl only possible from native West Texans, “T., nice girls don’t sing songs like that.”

My sister quickly ratted us out, as little sisters are prone to do. “S. and G. sing it.”

My mother didn’t miss a beat, as she said, with a barely noticeable smirk of pride, “S. and G. are not nice girls.”

I like that. I’m not sure she meant for me to like it, but I do. I embrace it. She is the voice in my head, and that voice is a glorious troublemaker.

It was that voice that set the stage for my pursuit of a graduate degree in Communication Studies with an interest in gender. Those two years at UNT introduced me to the trailblazers and writers whose work shaped feminism, and I fell in love with all of them. Betty Friedan and bell hooks, Simone Weil and Simone de Beauvoir – their words painted my world. I discovered in Eve Ensler the kind of person I want to be.

I am not an easy feminist. I am one of those annoying ones who see everyone’s voice as important, even those voices that disagree with me. They are all feminism to me. They are all essential. They should all be required reading in any worthwhile education.

I am also a Christian, and this informs my feminism, to a point. This is often confounding to both Christians and feminists. I feel the same need to put an asterisk after “Christian” when talking to feminists that I do to put an asterisk after “feminist” when talking to Christians, because both seem to always want an explanation as to why I’ve chosen to engage with the enemy. I don’t really see them as mutually exclusive, though. I think that feminism and Christianity, at their roots, have more commonalities than differences. I won’t deny that they are often unkind to each other. Maybe that’s what the asterisk is for –to indicate the “not the jerkface kind” footnote.

My definition is not an easy definition. It’s a general definition with infinite applications. My definition of feminism begins at the understanding that all are not born with equal opportunity and thus implies the exhortation that to be a feminist is to equalize, not just for myself but also for others, in any and every way imaginable.

What I Need From the Church

I’m participating this week in Feminisms Fest (details can be found at  From Two to One  – also… DO IT.  You know, if you want), but first I want to sweep out some cobwebs that have been collecting on my brain for a while.  A bit of thanks goes out to the authors of this post and this post for handing me the broom.

My mom asked me on Saturday why I don’t go to church regularly anymore.  I didn’t have a good answer.  She dropped it pretty quickly, which was both a surprise and a relief.  I’ve been expecting the question and subsequent awkward conversation for a while.  I haven’t attended church regularly since Christ Fellowship ended.  I’ve made a piddly effort, but I’m not super-concerned about regular attendance.  I don’t often say this out loud, because the people who ask that question would be super-concerned by that answer, which would lead to more indepth conversation on the subject, and I usually don’t care to discuss it further.

But today I do, because cobwebs are sticky and annoying.

My background with church in my adult life is this:

I went to First Baptist for a while, because I grew up attending a similar (although not as wealthy) church.  Also, I enjoy singing in the choir, and it had a good one.  That was enough for a while.  I stopped going for a lot of reasons, most of which had more to do with my own busyness and being-21-ness than with anything specific that the church did to drive me away.  Another factor was that my community/support system/whatever-you-want-to-call-it wasn’t there.  Going to church took me away from them, if only for a few hours a week.  It was the thing I did on the side of the rest of my life.

Then [a few years later], I started going to Christ Fellowship.  I came to my first meeting out of curiosity.  My roommate and I had been out for breakfast one Saturday morning, and I saw a group of people there, two of whom I knew.  These two were the last two people in Denton I expected to be having breakfast together – the very definition of opposites – yet there they were, clearly enjoying each other’s company.  So I went to their church, and I loved it.  It was the first community/support system/whatever-you-want-to-call-it that I had ever been a part of where I thought I really could call any of them at 4:00 in the morning, and they would answer and listen and give me a ride or help or whatever I needed.

So I stuck with them, through fights and splits and side-aching laughter and awkward tension and tears and joy and so very many meals.

Then we broke up for good.  The church stopped meeting.  Some people were super-concerned about those of us who are single getting left behind or falling through the cracks.

But I wasn’t worried.  I assumed that nothing would really change.  We were friends, right?  Friends don’t need an official weekly meeting or two to be each other’s community/support system/whatever-you-want-to-call-it.

I should have been more realistic.  Yes, we were friends.  Yes, we love each other.  But there are only so many hours in a day, and when you stop meeting when you normally meet, especially after you start meeting at that time with other people, you stop seeing one another.  It would be easy to blame them, but my life and schedule contribute to our no longer seeing one another just as much as theirs does.  And the phone works both ways.  It’s no one’s fault in particular.  It’s just how time works.  People get forgotten.  People get left out.  People fall through the cracks.

I fell through the cracks.

I’m not mad at The Church.  I mean, I’m often annoyed with it in general.  The Church does some pretty ridiculous things and is occasionally a gigantic asshat.  But that’s just people.  The Church doesn’t have anything figured out more than anyone else.  Perhaps it’s too much to expect that they would.

But I still need a community/support system/whatever-you-call-it.  And I want to know that it’s  still mine, even if I miss meetings or stop going altogether.  Will I still know you if our church falls apart?  If the answer is no, that’s not community, and that’s not what I need.  I already have enough of that – so many friends that I hardly ever see – and all the abandonment issues (fair or not) that accompany it.

Happy Valentine’s Day!

Fat Tuesday

My New Year’s Resolution has been enlightening. Annoying. Frustrating. And enlightening.

In focusing on a lot of things I want to stop doing, it has become more obvious what I want to start doing. I mean, I knew already what I wanted to start doing. Cooking at home more, eating better, actually going to the gym that I pay for or running or something at all active, writing every day, reading every day, living in a home that doesn’t look like some sort of natural disaster hit it…and the list goes on. There are moments of these things, but moments flee almost as soon as they arrive. I don’t just want moments of what I want my life to look like. I want a whole life of it.

The problem is that there are only so many hours in a day. Stupid time limits.

Lent for me has been a special time for increased reflection and mindfulness, and that will lend itself well to this process of whittling down what is extra to make room for what is good. The last month of following my resolutions has revealed a lot of things that I do that are just extras – things I do because I’m resting or restless or just wanting to do something but not too much, but that don’t necessarily add anything to my life other than pass the time. I am going to limit or eliminate these things altogether for the season. I won’t be playing Facebook games at all. I’ll be watching no more than one episode of TV a day (if that much) – so no weekend marathons for Lent. Those are the two main things that I do that don’t really add much to the pursuit of life as I want it to be, but I’m sure that there are others that Lent will reveal.

I think I am also going to cut out fast food for Lent. I might like it so much that I cut it out for good. I suspect that my eating it has a lot to do with my not doing a lot of other things (cooking, being active, etc.), so we’ll see how that goes. It may just turn into 40 days of soup, sandwiches, carrot sticks and bean dip, but we’ll see.

This is exactly what I wanted to read this morning.  Enjoy!

Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting There Is.